Since the recent terrorist attacks on the United States, the government has the capability to evesdrop on people's phone conversations. It is said that this is a method of protecting our country. However, the debate is whether or not this is a just way of protecting our country or if it is a major invasion of personal privacy.
Based on the Patriot Act, signed by George W. Bush, in October of 2001, the government does not need a reason or "warrant" to tap into a phone conversation or internet conversation. Although the idea here is very relevent and important, the method of action may be infringing on people's privacy rights.
In my research paper, I will research the government's methods and requirements on tapping in on these people's phone and internet conversations. Ultimately, I will come to a conclusion on whether this method of public protection is morally just and correct.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment